2011-05-11
Maid
Finally there is a maid so I am more relaxing, but she is kinda cooky and seems she would like to ask for money just like today when she massage with my mother, she told her that she charges for that normally and my mother said now is within ur working hour so she zip her mouth. When I knew, I was like wtf, anyway will see what happen after, hope she knows she is highly paid enough for us to hire two fillpino.
2011-01-17
Colonial deal built 'City of Sadness''
Vivian Kwok
Dec 6, 2010
To the poor people of Tin Shui Wai, more shops, markets and commercial developments would have meant more jobs close to home.
This could have been the difference between survival and desperation in the "City of Sadness", a place with a long history of family tragedies and abuse.
But a secret deal between the colonial government and a consortium - dubbed "unimaginable by today's standards" by one academic - has, in effect, limited the number of such outlets to this day to ensure that businesses in government buildings did not pose too much competition to those in the district's sole private estate, Kingswood Villas.
Though officials said the agreement was cancelled in 2002, the limits on proper zoning and town planning had been imposed. The undisclosed deal also raises questions whether there might be other secret agreements being kept from the public over the years that might have an impact on today's city planning.
The town of 273,800 residents has more than 9 per cent unemployment, the highest in Hong Kong. They face long and expensive trips to work elsewhere, if they can find jobs.
Under a private memorandum signed between the pre-handover government and developer Mightycity Company, now owned by Li Ka-shing's Cheung Kong (Holdings) and China Resources, commercial developments in the government buildings are not allowed to compete with the private shops in any way that would damage their viability.
This has meant that while public and subsidised housing estates occupy the bulk of the town, they have mainly small local-style businesses, shops and markets.
The memorandum even put paid to plans for a permanent market in the public part of the troubled town.
It was part of a deal - never publicly disclosed in full - under which the government bought almost 500 hectares of former fish ponds and farms back from developers 28 years ago at an above-market price then agreed to develop them as a joint venture.
This arrangement, which turned on its head the principle that developers wanting to develop agricultural land have to pay a premium, is also raising eyebrows. "The government's decision to purchase back the land at a premium from developers and the private memorandum are unimaginable by today's standards," said Dr Law Chi-kwong, associate professor in the department of social work and social administration at the University of Hong Kong.
Law, one of the very few people outside the government to have seen the agreement, said he understood only a handful of senior officials had access to it.
The story goes back to 1977 when the Special Committee on Land Production recommended a study on developing Tin Shui Wai.
Sensing an opportunity Mightycity, then owned 51 per cent by China Resources, 12.5 per cent by Li's Cheung Kong and 36.5 per cent by Wheelock Marden, Trafalgar Housing and others, began buying land in 1979, amassing 488 hectares.
Mightycity then approached the government with a proposal to build a new town to house more than half a million people. Its original business plan was to surrender land for public housing in exchange for the government building all the infrastructure.
The proposal was rejected in 1982 but the consortium accepted a better counter offer. On July 29, 1982, Nicky Chan Nai-keong, secretary for lands and works, said the government would pay Mightycity HK$2.258 billion for all the land and grant it almost 40 hectares for HK$800 million.
The government paid HK$46 a square foot, much higher than the valuation calculated from a land auction held by a court in 1980 to determine the value of an unresolved 7 per cent stake in Mightycity.
"The price of the land at HK$46 a sq ft was not low compared with the 1980 auction price at about HK$11.50 a sq ft. Moreover 1980 was a period of property boom while 1982 was a declining year," Lee Chi Ming wrote in an unpublished dissertation in 1987 at the University of Hong Kong.
Under the joint venture deal, inked on July 29, 1982, 169 hectares was designated a development zone, of which 38.8 hectares was granted to Mightycity for a private residential estate and 130 hectares was for public and subsidised housing. The government kept the rest as a land bank.
Cheung Kong and its chairman Li Ka-shing raised their stakes in Mightycity to 48.25 per cent and 0.75 per cent, respectively, in 1988 when the multibillion-dollar project went ahead. Cheung Kong was appointed project manager in the same year.
Mightycity built Kingswood Villas, the only private estate in Tin Shui Wai with 15,880 flats, in phases from 1992 to 1999. It included 75,000 square metres of commercial areas comprising the Kingswood Ginza mall and the 1,102-room Harbour Plaza Resort City.
At the same time the government was restrained from developing a self-sustaining new town by the memorandum stating that it could only develop commercial space as neighbourhood shops in the public housing estates and that "only to such extent as is calculated not to render the commercial accommodation to be provided by [Tin Shui Wai Development Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Mightycity] on the 38.8 hectares not commercially viable".
The effects of this were felt in 1988 when the government proposed to build a permanent market in Tin Shui Wai Area 33, which is now a bus terminus and the Central Park Towers. After the developer objected, the plan was changed to a temporary market.
In the Tin Shui Wai Outline Development Plan dated March 1989, the Territory Development Department wrote: "A permanent market was planned on the site ... to cater for the needs of the private residential development. [Mightycity] however objected to it on the grounds that the market may compete with the commercial facility within their private developments."
The department removed the project from its 1993 programme and the market had never been built, a University of Hong Kong study said.
The then Lands and Works Branch has never released the entire joint venture document in 28 years.
But Law said he had seen the document in 2006 when he was a member of the Commission on Poverty.
"I met some housing department officers to find out why the department was unable to build more markets and shopping centres in Tin Shui Wai to stimulate the local economy," he said.
"They leaked to me that they were constrained in developing commercial properties as a result of a private memorandum between the government and Mightycity."
Law then asked a "very senior government official", whom he refused to name, to show him the secret paper, and he understood the Housing Authority had kept one copy.
Replying to inquiries, the Housing Authority did not deny or confirm whether it had a copy, saying only: "The HA is not a party to the `memorandum' mentioned in the question and is not the authority in land administration."
It took the Development Bureau more than two weeks to dig out the document and digest it after being approached by the Post. A spokeswoman said the 1982 agreement was cancelled in 2002, as "there were no outstanding obligations remaining to be fulfilled by any of the parties".
By then, a master development plan for the 318 hectare reserve zone in Tin Shui Wai North had been endorsed in 1995 and the latest outline zoning plan for Tin Shui Wai had been approved in 1998. These plans assigned most of the land for residential purposes, in which 75 per cent was for public housing and the rest for private housing.
The unusual planning strategy left little space for commercial activities and what does exist, comprising 61,000 square metres of floor area, was sold to The Link in 2005.
Cheung Kong did not respond to repeated requests for comment.
Copyright (c) 2010. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
Dec 6, 2010
To the poor people of Tin Shui Wai, more shops, markets and commercial developments would have meant more jobs close to home.
This could have been the difference between survival and desperation in the "City of Sadness", a place with a long history of family tragedies and abuse.
But a secret deal between the colonial government and a consortium - dubbed "unimaginable by today's standards" by one academic - has, in effect, limited the number of such outlets to this day to ensure that businesses in government buildings did not pose too much competition to those in the district's sole private estate, Kingswood Villas.
Though officials said the agreement was cancelled in 2002, the limits on proper zoning and town planning had been imposed. The undisclosed deal also raises questions whether there might be other secret agreements being kept from the public over the years that might have an impact on today's city planning.
The town of 273,800 residents has more than 9 per cent unemployment, the highest in Hong Kong. They face long and expensive trips to work elsewhere, if they can find jobs.
Under a private memorandum signed between the pre-handover government and developer Mightycity Company, now owned by Li Ka-shing's Cheung Kong (Holdings) and China Resources, commercial developments in the government buildings are not allowed to compete with the private shops in any way that would damage their viability.
This has meant that while public and subsidised housing estates occupy the bulk of the town, they have mainly small local-style businesses, shops and markets.
The memorandum even put paid to plans for a permanent market in the public part of the troubled town.
It was part of a deal - never publicly disclosed in full - under which the government bought almost 500 hectares of former fish ponds and farms back from developers 28 years ago at an above-market price then agreed to develop them as a joint venture.
This arrangement, which turned on its head the principle that developers wanting to develop agricultural land have to pay a premium, is also raising eyebrows. "The government's decision to purchase back the land at a premium from developers and the private memorandum are unimaginable by today's standards," said Dr Law Chi-kwong, associate professor in the department of social work and social administration at the University of Hong Kong.
Law, one of the very few people outside the government to have seen the agreement, said he understood only a handful of senior officials had access to it.
The story goes back to 1977 when the Special Committee on Land Production recommended a study on developing Tin Shui Wai.
Sensing an opportunity Mightycity, then owned 51 per cent by China Resources, 12.5 per cent by Li's Cheung Kong and 36.5 per cent by Wheelock Marden, Trafalgar Housing and others, began buying land in 1979, amassing 488 hectares.
Mightycity then approached the government with a proposal to build a new town to house more than half a million people. Its original business plan was to surrender land for public housing in exchange for the government building all the infrastructure.
The proposal was rejected in 1982 but the consortium accepted a better counter offer. On July 29, 1982, Nicky Chan Nai-keong, secretary for lands and works, said the government would pay Mightycity HK$2.258 billion for all the land and grant it almost 40 hectares for HK$800 million.
The government paid HK$46 a square foot, much higher than the valuation calculated from a land auction held by a court in 1980 to determine the value of an unresolved 7 per cent stake in Mightycity.
"The price of the land at HK$46 a sq ft was not low compared with the 1980 auction price at about HK$11.50 a sq ft. Moreover 1980 was a period of property boom while 1982 was a declining year," Lee Chi Ming wrote in an unpublished dissertation in 1987 at the University of Hong Kong.
Under the joint venture deal, inked on July 29, 1982, 169 hectares was designated a development zone, of which 38.8 hectares was granted to Mightycity for a private residential estate and 130 hectares was for public and subsidised housing. The government kept the rest as a land bank.
Cheung Kong and its chairman Li Ka-shing raised their stakes in Mightycity to 48.25 per cent and 0.75 per cent, respectively, in 1988 when the multibillion-dollar project went ahead. Cheung Kong was appointed project manager in the same year.
Mightycity built Kingswood Villas, the only private estate in Tin Shui Wai with 15,880 flats, in phases from 1992 to 1999. It included 75,000 square metres of commercial areas comprising the Kingswood Ginza mall and the 1,102-room Harbour Plaza Resort City.
At the same time the government was restrained from developing a self-sustaining new town by the memorandum stating that it could only develop commercial space as neighbourhood shops in the public housing estates and that "only to such extent as is calculated not to render the commercial accommodation to be provided by [Tin Shui Wai Development Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Mightycity] on the 38.8 hectares not commercially viable".
The effects of this were felt in 1988 when the government proposed to build a permanent market in Tin Shui Wai Area 33, which is now a bus terminus and the Central Park Towers. After the developer objected, the plan was changed to a temporary market.
In the Tin Shui Wai Outline Development Plan dated March 1989, the Territory Development Department wrote: "A permanent market was planned on the site ... to cater for the needs of the private residential development. [Mightycity] however objected to it on the grounds that the market may compete with the commercial facility within their private developments."
The department removed the project from its 1993 programme and the market had never been built, a University of Hong Kong study said.
The then Lands and Works Branch has never released the entire joint venture document in 28 years.
But Law said he had seen the document in 2006 when he was a member of the Commission on Poverty.
"I met some housing department officers to find out why the department was unable to build more markets and shopping centres in Tin Shui Wai to stimulate the local economy," he said.
"They leaked to me that they were constrained in developing commercial properties as a result of a private memorandum between the government and Mightycity."
Law then asked a "very senior government official", whom he refused to name, to show him the secret paper, and he understood the Housing Authority had kept one copy.
Replying to inquiries, the Housing Authority did not deny or confirm whether it had a copy, saying only: "The HA is not a party to the `memorandum' mentioned in the question and is not the authority in land administration."
It took the Development Bureau more than two weeks to dig out the document and digest it after being approached by the Post. A spokeswoman said the 1982 agreement was cancelled in 2002, as "there were no outstanding obligations remaining to be fulfilled by any of the parties".
By then, a master development plan for the 318 hectare reserve zone in Tin Shui Wai North had been endorsed in 1995 and the latest outline zoning plan for Tin Shui Wai had been approved in 1998. These plans assigned most of the land for residential purposes, in which 75 per cent was for public housing and the rest for private housing.
The unusual planning strategy left little space for commercial activities and what does exist, comprising 61,000 square metres of floor area, was sold to The Link in 2005.
Cheung Kong did not respond to repeated requests for comment.
Copyright (c) 2010. South China Morning Post Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved.
2010-09-29
林本利﹕東隧加價 為要多賺0.2％？
正當政府快要公布3條過海隧道的車輛分流研究報告，東隧突然申請大幅加價四成，私家車收費由每程25元增加至35元，收費與紅隧（20元）進一步拉遠。
東隧申請加價，是根據2005年1月的獨立仲裁結果。當時仲裁人引用1997年的仲裁結果，裁定東隧在30年專營權內，每年可以繼續賺取15％至17％的「合理但非過多」的股本內部回報率。仲裁人除了支持東隧2005年加價外，還容許東隧可以在5年內再加價一次，以期達到賺取最少15％的股本內部回報率。
仲裁人在釐定東隧的合理回報時，不是像兩電一般以資產淨值為計算基礎，而是以股本作為計算基礎。東隧的總投資額約為22億元，當中7.5億來自股東，其餘是來自銀行貸款。這7.5億元的股本，便是用作計算股本內部回報率的基礎。
至於東隧的回報，亦非像兩電以公司利潤為準則，而是以淨現金流作為計算。淨現金流是每年的總收入（主要是隧道費），減去每年的現金支出，包括資本開支、經營開支（主要是員工薪酬，不包括折舊）、利息、利得稅、償還借貸等。
東隧在1986年獲政府批出專營權後，頭幾年股東總共投資7.5億元，淨現金流是負數。到1989年東隧通車後，公司開始賺取收入。扣除各項現金支出後，淨現金流變為「正數」。在計算淨現金流時，東隧是以派息作為準則。換言之，即使公司錄得正現金流，手上現金充裕，倘若不派息，股東仍未算收到淨現金流。
自從東隧在1994年開始派息後，到2009年為止，股東總共收取了46.6億元股息。今年東隧流量較去年增長近5%，平均每日接近66,000架次車輛使用，估計可以為公司帶來5億多元的淨現金流。倘若公司將這額外賺取的現金全數派息，到今年年底股息總數已經達到52億元，是7.5億元股本的7倍，每年股本內部回報率約13.3%。
東隧想先發制人增談判籌碼
筆者推算過，即使專營權屆滿（2016年8月6日）前不加價，東隧未來5年多，只要每年流量增長2%，額外可以多派30多億元股息（包括手上1.5億元現金）。整個30年專營權期間東隧一共獲得約86億元股息，是股本的11倍，每年股本內部回報率達到14.4%，已經是一項回報十分理想的投資。東隧的大股東中信泰富，從1988年6月至今，公司的股票總投資回報（包括股價上升和股息），每年亦不過12.8%，東隧的回報已足夠向股東交代。
倘若東隧加價四成，令汽車流量首年下跌一成，之後每年回升2%，公司未來5年多的淨現金流可以增加至約40億元，較不加價多6億多元。由於專營權只餘下不足6年，故此即使大幅加價四成，令紅隧擠塞情加劇，東隧每年股本內部回報率亦不過增加0.2%，達到14.6%。
很明顯東隧大幅加價，並非單單為股東爭取多賺0.2%的回報。東隧想先發制人，增加日後與政府洽談3條過海隧道車輛分流問題的談判籌碼；並且期望政府不要單單處理東隧和紅隧的車輛分流問題，亦要想辦法打救西隧，增加西隧的流量和收入。政府即使有意回購東隧，亦可能被迫要一併回購西隧。然而，由於西隧至今的淨現金流總額（股息減股本）還是負數，公司若要追回之前的損失，達到每年賺取15%的回報，回購價（連同償還銀行貸款）超過200億元。
東隧和西隧的大股東同屬中信泰富。公司在2008年10月公布因炒賣澳元衍生工具而虧損150億元，令股價一度暴跌超過一半，之後執法機構介入調查。現在中信泰富為了東隧每年多賺一兩億元而申請大幅加價，惹來公眾憤怒，嚴重損害公司形象，恐怕只會得不償失。
東隧申請加價，是根據2005年1月的獨立仲裁結果。當時仲裁人引用1997年的仲裁結果，裁定東隧在30年專營權內，每年可以繼續賺取15％至17％的「合理但非過多」的股本內部回報率。仲裁人除了支持東隧2005年加價外，還容許東隧可以在5年內再加價一次，以期達到賺取最少15％的股本內部回報率。
仲裁人在釐定東隧的合理回報時，不是像兩電一般以資產淨值為計算基礎，而是以股本作為計算基礎。東隧的總投資額約為22億元，當中7.5億來自股東，其餘是來自銀行貸款。這7.5億元的股本，便是用作計算股本內部回報率的基礎。
至於東隧的回報，亦非像兩電以公司利潤為準則，而是以淨現金流作為計算。淨現金流是每年的總收入（主要是隧道費），減去每年的現金支出，包括資本開支、經營開支（主要是員工薪酬，不包括折舊）、利息、利得稅、償還借貸等。
東隧在1986年獲政府批出專營權後，頭幾年股東總共投資7.5億元，淨現金流是負數。到1989年東隧通車後，公司開始賺取收入。扣除各項現金支出後，淨現金流變為「正數」。在計算淨現金流時，東隧是以派息作為準則。換言之，即使公司錄得正現金流，手上現金充裕，倘若不派息，股東仍未算收到淨現金流。
自從東隧在1994年開始派息後，到2009年為止，股東總共收取了46.6億元股息。今年東隧流量較去年增長近5%，平均每日接近66,000架次車輛使用，估計可以為公司帶來5億多元的淨現金流。倘若公司將這額外賺取的現金全數派息，到今年年底股息總數已經達到52億元，是7.5億元股本的7倍，每年股本內部回報率約13.3%。
東隧想先發制人增談判籌碼
筆者推算過，即使專營權屆滿（2016年8月6日）前不加價，東隧未來5年多，只要每年流量增長2%，額外可以多派30多億元股息（包括手上1.5億元現金）。整個30年專營權期間東隧一共獲得約86億元股息，是股本的11倍，每年股本內部回報率達到14.4%，已經是一項回報十分理想的投資。東隧的大股東中信泰富，從1988年6月至今，公司的股票總投資回報（包括股價上升和股息），每年亦不過12.8%，東隧的回報已足夠向股東交代。
倘若東隧加價四成，令汽車流量首年下跌一成，之後每年回升2%，公司未來5年多的淨現金流可以增加至約40億元，較不加價多6億多元。由於專營權只餘下不足6年，故此即使大幅加價四成，令紅隧擠塞情加劇，東隧每年股本內部回報率亦不過增加0.2%，達到14.6%。
很明顯東隧大幅加價，並非單單為股東爭取多賺0.2%的回報。東隧想先發制人，增加日後與政府洽談3條過海隧道車輛分流問題的談判籌碼；並且期望政府不要單單處理東隧和紅隧的車輛分流問題，亦要想辦法打救西隧，增加西隧的流量和收入。政府即使有意回購東隧，亦可能被迫要一併回購西隧。然而，由於西隧至今的淨現金流總額（股息減股本）還是負數，公司若要追回之前的損失，達到每年賺取15%的回報，回購價（連同償還銀行貸款）超過200億元。
東隧和西隧的大股東同屬中信泰富。公司在2008年10月公布因炒賣澳元衍生工具而虧損150億元，令股價一度暴跌超過一半，之後執法機構介入調查。現在中信泰富為了東隧每年多賺一兩億元而申請大幅加價，惹來公眾憤怒，嚴重損害公司形象，恐怕只會得不償失。
2010-08-24
菲警無能
菲律賓首都馬尼拉媒體報道說，又有一名在當地遭劫持的香港遊客因傷勢過重在醫院死亡。
馬尼拉一家電台報道稱，一位名叫Doris的女遊客星期二（8月24日）清晨死亡。
至此，這次震驚世界的遊客劫持事件已經造成九名香港遊客死亡。
香港政府機構星期二下半旗對遇難者致哀，香港證券交易所在當日開盤前也為遇難者默哀。
香港政府和中國政府都對有關事件作出強烈譴責，並要求菲律賓政府作解釋。
菲律賓總統阿基諾三世承諾將對有關事件進行徹底的調查。
不過阿基諾總統為菲律賓警察的行動作出辯護。
承認過失
而在此事件中廣受批評的菲律賓警方星期二表示，認為他們對劫持事件的處理程序沒有問題，但是承認在具體手法上存在過失。
有批評認為警方放任劫持者挾持人質長達近11小時的做法是錯誤的，但馬尼拉警察總監對此作出辯護。
他說警方一直以為曾擔任菲律賓警務處前高級督察的門多薩（Rolando Mendoza）仍有理智心態，因此希望通過談判解決問題。
他承認警方在具體戰術上可能有過失，並說將針對具體問題展開調查。
55歲的門多薩曾在菲律賓警務部門服役近30年，但在今年早些時候因勒索等指稱被免職，他劫持人質的目的就是希望強迫警方讓他官復原職。
他在星期一上午10時許於馬尼拉市中心劫持了這輛載有22名香港人和三名菲律賓人的香港康泰旅行社旅遊巴士。
劫持事件持續了近11小時，期間門多薩先後釋放了包括三名兒童在內的九名人質。
2010-08-23
2010-07-13
2010-06-15
想點先
唉，我覺得今年係人生以來最差嘅一年，仲以為上年已經夠差，今年仲PK。身體就一般，工作悶到爆（或許係好事因為零壓力）。去旅行比女飛，相機唔見左，又食錯野，又屙又嘔，辛苦到暈。
呢排仲得意，有個男仔話要打7我，因為佢話我煩佢條女，黐線。個條女又頭到未都係BS，又話條仔呢樣個樣，原來根本就冇分手，想騎牛搵馬，佢無打嚟我又會無啦啦打比佢啦，又遇人不淑。
明天放假真開心，今晚可以睇巴西對北韓，唔知北韓到底係咩料？肥田料定係真材實料呢？
最古怪就係9號仔鄭大世，他出生在日本愛知縣的名古屋市，父母是南韓人，她父母為了不讓他忘記母語，從小鄭大世就被送入了在日本朝鮮人總聯合會下屬的學校學習，因此他對北韓擁有了更加深厚的感情，夢想為北韓國家隊效力。他後來曾申請放棄韓國國籍加入朝鮮籍，但由於韓國政府不承認朝鮮是一個主權國家，因此拒絕了他的這一請求。
但他的這一特殊的雙重身份被國際足聯所認可，2007年6月，已是J1聯賽職業球員的他終於得償所願，被朝鮮國家足球隊招入隊中參加在澳門舉行的東亞四強賽的預選賽，結果在3場比賽中攻入8球，成為預選賽階段的最佳射手。在2008年2月舉行的這項賽事的決賽圈比賽中，又分別在對自己的出生國日本以及韓國時分別攻入一球，在對中國的比賽中也貢獻了一個助攻，這些成就使鄭大世聲名大噪。
鄭先生雖然受朝鮮思想影響，但係佢從未住居北韓，唔知當佢住反幾日會有咩反應。如果住係平壤，應該好少少。但係平壤出面，就可能有人食人，根據調查，日日都有人餓死。佢由細到大只係喺教科書認識北韓，根係天堂咁啦，兩父子玩哂，由朝到晚都要鞠躬敬禮，每個家庭都要吊住佢兩張相，一百巴仙無神論，簡直黐線。
呢排仲得意，有個男仔話要打7我，因為佢話我煩佢條女，黐線。個條女又頭到未都係BS，又話條仔呢樣個樣，原來根本就冇分手，想騎牛搵馬，佢無打嚟我又會無啦啦打比佢啦，又遇人不淑。
明天放假真開心，今晚可以睇巴西對北韓，唔知北韓到底係咩料？肥田料定係真材實料呢？
最古怪就係9號仔鄭大世，他出生在日本愛知縣的名古屋市，父母是南韓人，她父母為了不讓他忘記母語，從小鄭大世就被送入了在日本朝鮮人總聯合會下屬的學校學習，因此他對北韓擁有了更加深厚的感情，夢想為北韓國家隊效力。他後來曾申請放棄韓國國籍加入朝鮮籍，但由於韓國政府不承認朝鮮是一個主權國家，因此拒絕了他的這一請求。
但他的這一特殊的雙重身份被國際足聯所認可，2007年6月，已是J1聯賽職業球員的他終於得償所願，被朝鮮國家足球隊招入隊中參加在澳門舉行的東亞四強賽的預選賽，結果在3場比賽中攻入8球，成為預選賽階段的最佳射手。在2008年2月舉行的這項賽事的決賽圈比賽中，又分別在對自己的出生國日本以及韓國時分別攻入一球，在對中國的比賽中也貢獻了一個助攻，這些成就使鄭大世聲名大噪。
鄭先生雖然受朝鮮思想影響，但係佢從未住居北韓，唔知當佢住反幾日會有咩反應。如果住係平壤，應該好少少。但係平壤出面，就可能有人食人，根據調查，日日都有人餓死。佢由細到大只係喺教科書認識北韓，根係天堂咁啦，兩父子玩哂，由朝到晚都要鞠躬敬禮，每個家庭都要吊住佢兩張相，一百巴仙無神論，簡直黐線。
2010-05-31
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)